[DEV SITE] - CBR16 TESTING AND DEVELOPMENT

Search This Site

| Log in
  1. Follow us on Facebook
  2. Follow us on Twitter
  3. Follow us on Instagram
  4. Follow us on Goodreads
  5. RSS Feeds

  • Home
  • About
    • About CBR
    • Getting Started
    • FAQ
    • CBR Book Club
    • Fan Mail
    • AlabamaPink
  • Our Team
    • Leaderboard
    • The CBR Team
    • Recent Comments
    • CBR Interviews
    • Our Volunteers
    • Meet MsWas
  • Categories
    • Genres
    • Tags
    • Star Ratings
  • Fight Cancer
    • How We Fight Cancer
    • Donating to Cannonball Read, Inc.
    • CBR Merchandise
    • Supporters and Friends of CBR
  • Contact
    • Contact Form
    • Newsletter Sign Up
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Follow Us

Hated this Textbook

June 30, 2016 by Andrea Krieter Leave a Comment

While the authors had good intentions, I was thoroughly disappointed in this book. The whole premise of this book is so that educators can use YA as a teaching aide. However, the authors have only thinly disguised their preference for classics. The tone I found while reading is that “Oh this YA book is good… but classics are still better.” and “teenagers won’t change their views/perspectives based off books!”. Both these statement are total bullshit for me so I highly disagreed with their opinions and I was mainly just pissed with this book.

Also they did have some good suggestions for YA books, but most of them were highly outdated. They never mentioned the popular YA books of now like Divergent, The Fault in Our Stars, Throne of Glass, An Ember in the Ashes, or The Selection. The book was also filled with old time references such as Gone with the Wind. Which made this book feel like it wasn’t even written for teenagers, let alone by people who understood teenagers. I think I should rewrite this for them and it would be well written, relatable and up to date.

In addition, they didn’t proof this edition very well. I found a multitude of mistakes including incorrect titles, incorrect author names and just plain false assumptions without any evidence! One thing that really pissed me off was that they incorrectly assumed that Ruta Sepetys dedicated her book Between Shades of Gray to her father. If they had done five minutes of research they would known that it is dedicated to her grandfather, a Lithuanian military officer, who had to flee Lithuanian because Stalin was executing officers.

Overall, I really didn’t like this book and I was very tempted to burn it or throw it out a window. Alas I could not because it’s a rental. If you want a book to instruct you on using YA in the class, pick a different one, because this one sucks.

Filed Under: Non-Fiction Tagged With: About YA, most frustrating, ugh

About Andrea Krieter

CBR 8

View Andrea Krieter's reviews»

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Mswas Administrator
    on CBR Diversions: Holiday Season –Time To Give BOOKS
    can i make this comment
  • Emmalita
    on CBR Diversions: Holiday Season –Time To Give BOOKS
    Leaving a comment! As scheduled
  • Rochelle
    on CBR Diversions: Holiday Season –Time To Give BOOKS
    Great review
  • sam
    on Admin test of non book review
    another one
  • fred
    on Admin test of non book review
    subscriptin test
See More Recent Comments »

Want to Help Out?

CBR has a great crew of volunteers, and we're always looking for more people to help out. If you have a specialty or are willing to learn, drop MsWas a line.

  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Volunteers
  • CBR11 Final Standings
  • AlabamaPink
  • FAQ
  • Contact

You can donate to CBR via:

  1. PayPal
  2. Venmo
  3. Google Pay

Copyright © 2026 · Minimum Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in