3.5 stars
Jerusha “Judy” Abbott is a Canadian orphan, who at 17 is still living in the orphanage, mainly because they are using her as free help. She is frequently told that she needs to keep her strong opinions and overactive imagination to herself, or nothing will come of her. She dreams of becoming a famous author and when a wealthy benefactor of the orphanage offers to send her to college on a scholarship, she is closer to achieving said dream. She doesn’t know who he is, having only seen his shadow as he left the matron’s office, but she knows that he is tall, and his shadow resembled a daddy long-legs. Hence, when she is told that she needs to write letters to her benefactor detailing her progress, she addresses each one to “Dear Daddy Long-Legs”.
Having never had a family of her own, Judy (as she reinvents herself at college. Who can blame her for wanting to be rid of the name Jerusha?) starts imagining that Daddy Long-Legs all the relatives she’s been missing. Going to college and receiving an education, Judy thrives. She loves learning, she loves improving her writing and making new friends. She never gets any replies to her letters, but the occasional gift (sometimes quite extravagant) proves that her anonymous rich benefactor reads her missives and doesn’t want her to feel left out among the other girls at the college. Very occasionally, Judy will get written instructions through her benefactor’s secretary, who among other things, helps find her places to spend her summers, while the other girls go home to their families.
As she grows older and her education is coming to an end, Judy becomes more and more curious about the identity of “Daddy Long-Legs” and tries to use her prodigious imagination to figure out who he might be.
I picked up this book both because Dear Mr. Knightley, which I really liked, was inspired by it (which meant that I wasn’t really surprised by any of the major story beats, as they are pretty much the same) and because Forever YoungAdult and the Book Smugglers, both review sites I trust and often agree with, rated it 5 stars and called it a must-read classic. Written in 1912, I’m sure this is a beloved book to many, but whether it’s because I’d just read modern book with a very similar plot, or whether I just found some aspects of the book a bit disturbing, it just didn’t entirely work for me.
Full review here.
I remember reading this in high school and being suuuuper creeped out by the whole “Daddy” thing. I’ve never wanted to revisit it, and your review is just a reminder.
This is one of those classic books that people now describe as “problematic”, isn’t it? In that ersatz code that means “unacceptable” but we are trying to put a good face on it like they do in biography shows when “tumultuous relationship” is the code phrase for “abusive”.